Search

Working for Illinois Caucus

House Downstate Democrats work for the good people of Illinois

Tag

06-RK Email 11

Lawmakers Working on Bills to Promote Organ Donations

https://ift.tt/2FlToqq

STATE LAWMAKERS ARE WORKING ON A COUPLE OF BILLS TO HELP INCREASE ORGAN DONATION IN ILLINOIS. 

 

THERE’S A REAL NEED FOR LIVE ORGAN DONORS TO PROVIDE KIDNEYS AND BONE MARROW TO THOSE WHO ARE SICK SAYS VILLA PARK REPRESENTATIVE DEB CONROY. HER BILL MAKES SURE DONORS AREN’T DISCRIMINATED AGAINST WHEN IT COMES TO LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUMS AND TAKING TIME OFF OF WORK. ADDITONALLY:

 

 

A SECOND BILL OFFERS A TAX CREDIT TO EMPLOYERS WHO GIVE WORKERS 30 DAYS PAID LEAVE FOR AN ORGAN DONATION SAYS MEGAN CRAIG WITH THE NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS.

 

PEOPLE WANTING TO DONATE A KIDNEY OR BONE MARROW TO HELP SAVE A LIFE OFTEN RUN INTO ROADBLOCKS AT WORK.

01-All No Sub,02-Pol,15-Health,19-Legal,24-ILGA,25-Working,26-Delivered,06-RK Email 11,HL,HL New,RKPRS HL

Feeds,Local,Region: Lincoln,Region: Central

via Local News https://ift.tt/1s5blu8

March 23, 2019 at 10:01AM

Illinois Lawmakers Look to Increase Living Organ Donors Via Legal Protections

https://ift.tt/2FogTjQ

Illinois Lawmakers Look to Increase Living Organ Donors Via Legal Protections

State Capitol – Rep Deb Conroy (D) is backing two bills, along with Sen Julie Morrison (D) that would provide protections for living organ donors. Rep Conroy has a keen insight into the need for such donations. She recently donated one of her kidneys to her ex-husband.

One bill, HB-2487, would keep insurance companies from charging higher insurance rates to those who donate an organ, and would require businesses to pay employees who donate an organ for up to 60 days, while they’re away from work recovering from their donation surgery. SB-67 would give businesses a tax credit of up to 25% of a donors wages or salary, if the business gives at least 30 days of PAID leave when the employee is off following an organ donation.

01-All No Sub,02-Pol,06-RK Email 11,15-Health,19-Legal,24-ILGA,26-Delivered,25-Working,HL,HL New,RKPRS HL

Feeds,News,Region: Statewide,Politics

via Illinois Channel https://ift.tt/24SeWRi

March 19, 2019 at 06:17PM

Illinois Democrats seek to rein in drug prices; Republicans say it will backfire

https://ift.tt/2Xyyixu

SPRINGFIELD — Democrats in the Illinois House are pushing a package of bills they say would help control the spiraling cost of prescription drugs.

Republicans, however, are arguing that the entire issue of prescription drug costs is beyond the scope of state government, and that some of the Democrats’ proposals could actually end up costing taxpayers and making lifesaving medications less available to people in the state.

The package of bills is largely based on recommendations from Families USA, a national consumer health advocacy group based in Washington that has been working with lawmakers to develop the bills.

Those bills call for regulating some drug prices in much the same way the state regulates utility rates, taxing drug price increases that exceed the rate of inflation, and requiring drug companies to disclose more information about their prices.

One bill by Rep. Anna Moeller, an Elgin Democrat, would create a mechanism for the state to become a licensed wholesaler of cheaper drugs from Canada.

“People in Illinois are being crushed by the high cost of essential medicines,” said state Rep. Will Guzzardi, a Chicago Democrat who chairs the House Prescription Drug Affordability and Accessibility Committee.

At a hearing Friday in Chicago, Illinois lawmakers heard stories about how the rising cost of prescriptions is endangering the lives of the poor, the elderly and people with HIV.

“Current prescription drug trends are not sustainable. The current system is simply shifting costs onto patients and taxpayers, while drug companies remain free to set incredibly high prices and increase them pretty much anytime they want to,” said Andre Jordan, associate state director for advocacy of AARP Illinois.

Drug manufacturers, insurance companies and others fought back, proclaiming their innocence and, at times, blaming one another for putting lifesaving medicine out of reach for many Americans.

Families USA’s Justin Mendoza laid most of the blame for spiraling prices on pharmaceutical manufacturers, who are granted long-term patents on new drugs that can prevent lower-cost generic drugs from entering the market for years, and on pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, who act as a kind of middleman between manufacturers and insurers to negotiate prices and devise “formularies” that determine which drugs the insurers will pay for.

He also said the federal government, and federal taxpayers, fund much of the research that goes into developing new drugs, even though, he argued, they don’t necessarily see a return on that investment once the drugs hit the market under a patent owned by a pharmaceutical company.

“Illinois has an opportunity to act on all these pieces, and to act on drug prices with substantial reforms that will make changes in people’s lives today and help direct the conversation forward all over the country,” Mendoza said.

Republicans on the panel said they were skeptical the state of Illinois had the ability to control what happens in a national, or even international pharmaceutical market.

And Rep. Deanne Mazzochi, an Elmhurst Republican, argued that regulating prices in the private sector could end up costing taxpayers in the form of higher prices in Medicare and Medicaid. That’s because those programs buy drugs at below wholesale prices, and drug companies make up the difference by charging private insurance plans more.

“If you set a ceiling on reimbursement on the private side, then the net effect of that is that prices for Medicare and Medicaid are going to have to go up to compensate,” she said. “Because if you can’t charge higher prices on the private-sector side, then you’re going to have to boost up everything on the Medicaid-Medicare side. So it kind of winds up being a bit of a wash.”

The legislation pending in the House includes:

House Bill 2880, by Guzzardi, imposing a tax on some drug price increases that exceed the rate of inflation.

House Bill 3493, by Guzzardi, establishing a state board to regulate drug prices in a way similar to utility rate regulation through the Illinois Commerce Commission.

House Bill 156, by Rep. Mary Flowers, a Chicago Democrat, requiring drug companies to disclose information about their pricing systems, including how much they spend on marketing.

• And House Bill 1441, by Moeller, allowing the state to be a licensed wholesaler of imported drugs from Canada.

01-All No Sub,02-Pol,06-RK Email 11,15-Health,16-Econ,19-Legal,24-ILGA,26-Delivered,25-Working,E Lazare-Mona,RK Client,HL,HL New,RKPRS HL

Feeds,Region: AH,Region: Suburbs,Business,City: Arlington Heights

via DailyHerald.com > Business https://ift.tt/2mmWPp0

March 2, 2019 at 04:42PM

Illinois Democrats seek to rein in drug prices; Republicans say it will backfire

https://ift.tt/2Xyyixu

SPRINGFIELD — Democrats in the Illinois House are pushing a package of bills they say would help control the spiraling cost of prescription drugs.

Republicans, however, are arguing that the entire issue of prescription drug costs is beyond the scope of state government, and that some of the Democrats’ proposals could actually end up costing taxpayers and making lifesaving medications less available to people in the state.

The package of bills is largely based on recommendations from Families USA, a national consumer health advocacy group based in Washington that has been working with lawmakers to develop the bills.

Those bills call for regulating some drug prices in much the same way the state regulates utility rates, taxing drug price increases that exceed the rate of inflation, and requiring drug companies to disclose more information about their prices.

One bill by Rep. Anna Moeller, an Elgin Democrat, would create a mechanism for the state to become a licensed wholesaler of cheaper drugs from Canada.

“People in Illinois are being crushed by the high cost of essential medicines,” said state Rep. Will Guzzardi, a Chicago Democrat who chairs the House Prescription Drug Affordability and Accessibility Committee.

At a hearing Friday in Chicago, Illinois lawmakers heard stories about how the rising cost of prescriptions is endangering the lives of the poor, the elderly and people with HIV.

“Current prescription drug trends are not sustainable. The current system is simply shifting costs onto patients and taxpayers, while drug companies remain free to set incredibly high prices and increase them pretty much anytime they want to,” said Andre Jordan, associate state director for advocacy of AARP Illinois.

Drug manufacturers, insurance companies and others fought back, proclaiming their innocence and, at times, blaming one another for putting lifesaving medicine out of reach for many Americans.

Families USA’s Justin Mendoza laid most of the blame for spiraling prices on pharmaceutical manufacturers, who are granted long-term patents on new drugs that can prevent lower-cost generic drugs from entering the market for years, and on pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, who act as a kind of middleman between manufacturers and insurers to negotiate prices and devise “formularies” that determine which drugs the insurers will pay for.

He also said the federal government, and federal taxpayers, fund much of the research that goes into developing new drugs, even though, he argued, they don’t necessarily see a return on that investment once the drugs hit the market under a patent owned by a pharmaceutical company.

“Illinois has an opportunity to act on all these pieces, and to act on drug prices with substantial reforms that will make changes in people’s lives today and help direct the conversation forward all over the country,” Mendoza said.

Republicans on the panel said they were skeptical the state of Illinois had the ability to control what happens in a national, or even international pharmaceutical market.

And Rep. Deanne Mazzochi, an Elmhurst Republican, argued that regulating prices in the private sector could end up costing taxpayers in the form of higher prices in Medicare and Medicaid. That’s because those programs buy drugs at below wholesale prices, and drug companies make up the difference by charging private insurance plans more.

“If you set a ceiling on reimbursement on the private side, then the net effect of that is that prices for Medicare and Medicaid are going to have to go up to compensate,” she said. “Because if you can’t charge higher prices on the private-sector side, then you’re going to have to boost up everything on the Medicaid-Medicare side. So it kind of winds up being a bit of a wash.”

The legislation pending in the House includes:

House Bill 2880, by Guzzardi, imposing a tax on some drug price increases that exceed the rate of inflation.

House Bill 3493, by Guzzardi, establishing a state board to regulate drug prices in a way similar to utility rate regulation through the Illinois Commerce Commission.

House Bill 156, by Rep. Mary Flowers, a Chicago Democrat, requiring drug companies to disclose information about their pricing systems, including how much they spend on marketing.

• And House Bill 1441, by Moeller, allowing the state to be a licensed wholesaler of imported drugs from Canada.

01-All No Sub,02-Pol,06-RK Email 11,15-Health,16-Econ,19-Legal,24-ILGA,26-Delivered,25-Working,E Lazare-Mona,RK Client,HL,HL New,RKPRS HL

Feeds,Region: AH,Region: Suburbs,Business,City: Arlington Heights

via DailyHerald.com > Business https://ift.tt/2mmWPp0

March 2, 2019 at 04:42PM

Illinois Democrats seek to rein in drug prices; Republicans say it will backfire

https://ift.tt/2Xyyixu

SPRINGFIELD — Democrats in the Illinois House are pushing a package of bills they say would help control the spiraling cost of prescription drugs.

Republicans, however, are arguing that the entire issue of prescription drug costs is beyond the scope of state government, and that some of the Democrats’ proposals could actually end up costing taxpayers and making lifesaving medications less available to people in the state.

The package of bills is largely based on recommendations from Families USA, a national consumer health advocacy group based in Washington that has been working with lawmakers to develop the bills.

Those bills call for regulating some drug prices in much the same way the state regulates utility rates, taxing drug price increases that exceed the rate of inflation, and requiring drug companies to disclose more information about their prices.

One bill by Rep. Anna Moeller, an Elgin Democrat, would create a mechanism for the state to become a licensed wholesaler of cheaper drugs from Canada.

“People in Illinois are being crushed by the high cost of essential medicines,” said state Rep. Will Guzzardi, a Chicago Democrat who chairs the House Prescription Drug Affordability and Accessibility Committee.

At a hearing Friday in Chicago, Illinois lawmakers heard stories about how the rising cost of prescriptions is endangering the lives of the poor, the elderly and people with HIV.

“Current prescription drug trends are not sustainable. The current system is simply shifting costs onto patients and taxpayers, while drug companies remain free to set incredibly high prices and increase them pretty much anytime they want to,” said Andre Jordan, associate state director for advocacy of AARP Illinois.

Drug manufacturers, insurance companies and others fought back, proclaiming their innocence and, at times, blaming one another for putting lifesaving medicine out of reach for many Americans.

Families USA’s Justin Mendoza laid most of the blame for spiraling prices on pharmaceutical manufacturers, who are granted long-term patents on new drugs that can prevent lower-cost generic drugs from entering the market for years, and on pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, who act as a kind of middleman between manufacturers and insurers to negotiate prices and devise “formularies” that determine which drugs the insurers will pay for.

He also said the federal government, and federal taxpayers, fund much of the research that goes into developing new drugs, even though, he argued, they don’t necessarily see a return on that investment once the drugs hit the market under a patent owned by a pharmaceutical company.

“Illinois has an opportunity to act on all these pieces, and to act on drug prices with substantial reforms that will make changes in people’s lives today and help direct the conversation forward all over the country,” Mendoza said.

Republicans on the panel said they were skeptical the state of Illinois had the ability to control what happens in a national, or even international pharmaceutical market.

And Rep. Deanne Mazzochi, an Elmhurst Republican, argued that regulating prices in the private sector could end up costing taxpayers in the form of higher prices in Medicare and Medicaid. That’s because those programs buy drugs at below wholesale prices, and drug companies make up the difference by charging private insurance plans more.

“If you set a ceiling on reimbursement on the private side, then the net effect of that is that prices for Medicare and Medicaid are going to have to go up to compensate,” she said. “Because if you can’t charge higher prices on the private-sector side, then you’re going to have to boost up everything on the Medicaid-Medicare side. So it kind of winds up being a bit of a wash.”

The legislation pending in the House includes:

House Bill 2880, by Guzzardi, imposing a tax on some drug price increases that exceed the rate of inflation.

House Bill 3493, by Guzzardi, establishing a state board to regulate drug prices in a way similar to utility rate regulation through the Illinois Commerce Commission.

House Bill 156, by Rep. Mary Flowers, a Chicago Democrat, requiring drug companies to disclose information about their pricing systems, including how much they spend on marketing.

• And House Bill 1441, by Moeller, allowing the state to be a licensed wholesaler of imported drugs from Canada.

01-All No Sub,02-Pol,06-RK Email 11,15-Health,16-Econ,19-Legal,24-ILGA,26-Delivered,25-Working,E Lazare-Mona,RK Client,HL,HL New,RKPRS HL

Feeds,Region: AH,Region: Suburbs,Business,City: Arlington Heights

via DailyHerald.com > Business https://ift.tt/2mmWPp0

March 2, 2019 at 04:42PM

More, better funding for mental health services proposed

http://bit.ly/2IpIvsq

SPRINGFIELD – An Illinois advocacy group is pushing legislation it says would bring $50 million in new money to state mental health services over the next four years.

According to the Illinois Coalition for Better Mental Health Care, more than 2.5 million Illinoisans have a mental health condition.

But the state ranks only 38th in the nation for mental health investment, while 82 of its 102 counties are designated as mental health professional shortage areas by the federal government.

Two lawmakers, Rep. Deb Conroy (D-Villa Park) and Sen. Heather Steans (D-Chicago), are sponsoring legislation – House Bill 2486 and Senate Bill 1673 – that would ramp up state mental health funding and change the funding structure to incentivize good results over flat service fees.

“Thousands of Illinois families … are victims of our mental health crisis,” Conroy, who heads the House Mental Health Committee, said Monday in a news release. “By creating a multiyear solution to reinvest and restructure our mental health programs with targeted, federally matched dollars, we can provide renewed hope to the millions affected.”

Most of the services targeted by the bills are Medicaid services, for which the federal government matches funding.

“The phase-in of rates that would enable growth of [mental health services] would happen slowly over a four-year period,” said Heather O’Donnell, who drafted the legislation and is vice president at Chicago-based mental health group Thresholds.

In year one, Illinois would provide $3.4 million of new funding, to be matched by the federal government. In year two, $5.7 million; in year three, $10.7 million; and in year four, $13 million.

After four years, O’Donnell said, the state would pay no more than $13 million in additional mental health funding in any given year, while the total new funding for state mental health services would reach more than $50 million with federal matching.

The state would also have to cover startup costs in years three and four, and bring additional funding to components of the bill that are not matched with federal funds.

So, although this federal matching would provide a much-needed funding boost, it is not clear where the new state money would come from.

“Preferably it would be new revenue,” O’Donnell said. “Some of it could come from the legalization of cannabis, but we are not specifying revenue sources [in the bills].”

Conroy agreed, saying “we’re all hoping for new revenue,” particularly from internet gambling and legalized marijuana.

“I know there is a commitment that some of the revenue from cannabis will go to mental health and addiction services, so that’s on the table,” Conroy said without discussing specifics. “And I do believe the commitment [to mental health and addiction] is there from the governor. He’s made it clear that’s a priority for him.”

Without specific funding plans, the bills more or less just lay groundwork for the new funding and changed payment methods.

Those changed payment methods deal with how mental health providers get money for the services they provide.

Currently, nearly all Medicaid contracts with mental health providers in Illinois are fee-for-service – the providers provide the service, and get reimbursed a specified fee.

The bills claim that this structure “allows for no innovation” in providing better services, because there is no reward for better outcomes and efficiency.

If passed, the bills would create a working group of providers, managed care organizations and state health workers, to figure out a set of metrics to “bring the regulatory structure in line with modern health care,” O’Donnell said.

These metrics would drive a new “pay-for-performance” structure, which providers could opt into each year, or opt out of after two years if they don’t like it.

Both bills await further assignments to committee.

010-Inoreader Saves,01-All No Sub,02-Pol,06-RK Email 11,15-Health,19-Legal,24-ILGA,26-Delivered,25-Working,RK Client,HL,HL New,RKPRS HL

via Effingham Daily News

February 18, 2019 at 07:42PM

More, better funding for mental health services proposed

http://bit.ly/2IpIvsq

SPRINGFIELD – An Illinois advocacy group is pushing legislation it says would bring $50 million in new money to state mental health services over the next four years.

According to the Illinois Coalition for Better Mental Health Care, more than 2.5 million Illinoisans have a mental health condition.

But the state ranks only 38th in the nation for mental health investment, while 82 of its 102 counties are designated as mental health professional shortage areas by the federal government.

Two lawmakers, Rep. Deb Conroy (D-Villa Park) and Sen. Heather Steans (D-Chicago), are sponsoring legislation – House Bill 2486 and Senate Bill 1673 – that would ramp up state mental health funding and change the funding structure to incentivize good results over flat service fees.

“Thousands of Illinois families … are victims of our mental health crisis,” Conroy, who heads the House Mental Health Committee, said Monday in a news release. “By creating a multiyear solution to reinvest and restructure our mental health programs with targeted, federally matched dollars, we can provide renewed hope to the millions affected.”

Most of the services targeted by the bills are Medicaid services, for which the federal government matches funding.

“The phase-in of rates that would enable growth of [mental health services] would happen slowly over a four-year period,” said Heather O’Donnell, who drafted the legislation and is vice president at Chicago-based mental health group Thresholds.

In year one, Illinois would provide $3.4 million of new funding, to be matched by the federal government. In year two, $5.7 million; in year three, $10.7 million; and in year four, $13 million.

After four years, O’Donnell said, the state would pay no more than $13 million in additional mental health funding in any given year, while the total new funding for state mental health services would reach more than $50 million with federal matching.

The state would also have to cover startup costs in years three and four, and bring additional funding to components of the bill that are not matched with federal funds.

So, although this federal matching would provide a much-needed funding boost, it is not clear where the new state money would come from.

“Preferably it would be new revenue,” O’Donnell said. “Some of it could come from the legalization of cannabis, but we are not specifying revenue sources [in the bills].”

Conroy agreed, saying “we’re all hoping for new revenue,” particularly from internet gambling and legalized marijuana.

“I know there is a commitment that some of the revenue from cannabis will go to mental health and addiction services, so that’s on the table,” Conroy said without discussing specifics. “And I do believe the commitment [to mental health and addiction] is there from the governor. He’s made it clear that’s a priority for him.”

Without specific funding plans, the bills more or less just lay groundwork for the new funding and changed payment methods.

Those changed payment methods deal with how mental health providers get money for the services they provide.

Currently, nearly all Medicaid contracts with mental health providers in Illinois are fee-for-service – the providers provide the service, and get reimbursed a specified fee.

The bills claim that this structure “allows for no innovation” in providing better services, because there is no reward for better outcomes and efficiency.

If passed, the bills would create a working group of providers, managed care organizations and state health workers, to figure out a set of metrics to “bring the regulatory structure in line with modern health care,” O’Donnell said.

These metrics would drive a new “pay-for-performance” structure, which providers could opt into each year, or opt out of after two years if they don’t like it.

Both bills await further assignments to committee.

010-Inoreader Saves,01-All No Sub,02-Pol,06-RK Email 11,15-Health,19-Legal,24-ILGA,26-Delivered,25-Working,RK Client,HL,HL New,RKPRS HL

via Effingham Daily News

February 18, 2019 at 07:42PM

New Progressive Caucus sets agenda

http://bit.ly/2UYw3RM

Reps. in House check off minimum wage, set sights on pot legalization, campaign finances

State Reps. Theresa Mah and Will Guzzardi at Thursday’s announcement of the Progressive Caucus. (Twitter/BlueRoomStream)

State Reps. Theresa Mah and Will Guzzardi at Thursday’s announcement of the Progressive Caucus. (Twitter/BlueRoomStream)

By Ted Cox

The new House Progressive Caucus can already check off one major achievement.

On Thursday, the 17-member Progressive Caucus formally announced its legislative agenda, capped later that day by passing its lead item: a $15-an-hour minimum wage.

To come is legalization of marijuana and a small-donor match in campaign finances.

Rep. Will Guzzardi, of Chicago, co-chairman of the new caucus, announced plans for the new legislative bloc shortly after the November general election along with Chairwomen Reps. Carol Ammons of Urbana and Theresa Mah of Chicago.

After saying they had talked with about 10 legislators about forming the caucus last spring, they stood with 14 colleagues in proclaiming the Progressive Caucus on Thursday.

“It’s a new day in Illinois, and we’re excited to lead on this bold agenda,” Guzzardi said. “By enacting these policies, and by organizing around our shared vision, we’ll be able to move our state forward and pass legislation that will transform the lives of the people of this state. I’m excited to be a part of this caucus, and to stand together with so many of my colleagues in this work.”

Legalization of recreational cannabis, with “tight regulations and sensible taxation,” will “reverse a trend of senseless incarceration for minor drug users and create economic benefits for Illinois,” according to the caucus. Rep. Kelly Cassidy of Chicago is leading that initiative.

Saying, “The influence of big-dollar donors and candidates in Illinois politics must be curbed,” the caucus is also backing what it calls a “small-donor match” in campaign finance reform. It would set aside a fund to provide matching donations up to a certain level in order to “level the playing field” with big donors and dark money.

In addition to the three chairs and Cassidy, the caucus includes officers Rep. Celina Villanueva as treasurer and Rep. Delia Ramirez as secretary, House Majority Leader Greg Harris, and member Reps. Sara Feigenholtz, Robyn Gabel, Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz, Rob Martwick, Joyce Mason, Anna Moeller, Aaron Ortiz, Lamont Robinson, Anne Stava-Murray, and Maurice West.

01-All No Sub,02-Pol,06-RK Email 11,19-Legal,24-ILGA,26-Delivered,25-Working

Feeds,Politics

via Stories – 1IL http://bit.ly/2RDSoGd

February 18, 2019 at 09:06AM

Rep. Connor responds to report of coal ash pollution in Romeoville, Will County

https://ift.tt/2QdUkW9

John Connor
John Connor

State Rep. John Connor, D-Lockport, announced he is engaging owners of power plants named in a report on coal ash pollution around Illinois, including Will County.

“I originally learned about the potential dangers of the coal ash ponds present in my district after meeting with Prairie Rivers Network advocacy group last year,” Connor said in a statement. “I appreciated the meeting because they informed me of the issue of coal ash disposal in the power generating industry, and how renewable energy could help address them.”

Connor said he advocated for renewable energy and improved environmental guidelines.

“After recently meeting with NRG, who has been proactive on this topic, and the village of Romeoville to discuss the coal ash ponds and water contamination, it is clear that significant change in the handling of coal ash is coming,” Connor said. “I’m hopeful that the new administration will implement policies to protect out environment, while looking long term by choosing to invest in renewable energy sources.”

01-All No Sub,02-Pol,06-RK Email 11,17-Energy,19-Legal,25-Working,26-Delivered,24-ILGA

Feeds,News,City: Joliet,Region: Joliet,Region: South Suburbs

via The Herald-News https://ift.tt/2SHQ4f3

December 6, 2018 at 05:02PM

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑